‘The thing about Finnish is that it’s not linear,
it’s orbital,’ said the ticket collector on the 10:35 train to Leeds. ‘The
language comes from the land. You have to find the object in the sentence and
then everything else around it will make sense.’
We sat open-mouthed, as he then changed linguistic
tracks and recited a verse from a Sami poem where an old woman is singing out
to the dark forest.
What you have to remember is that, in both these
languages, the word for art and knowledge is the same… the train to Hebden
Bridge will depart from Platform 12.’
One thing I knew for sure was that a conversation
with Martin would not be straightforward. That although we would be speaking in
English, a language hewn from a mix of many cultures, his stories come unexpected,
feathered, leaved, rain-wet and roaring, from a collective language that has no
borders. Mythologist and writer, he has been telling his wild alchemical tales
to Dark Mountaineers for years now, in his books, his teaching (at the
Westcountry School of Myth and Storytelling ) and most strikingly at our annual
events - and from all these emerge a depth, a heart, a clarity, a
connectedness, that you cannot not find in modern cynical end-of-the-world
narratives.
I have a notebook page open on the topics in order
but of course they get mixed up, as his answers jump like roe deer out of the
thicket and twist like a shoal of lapwings in a darkening sky. You gaze in
wonder at the shape and movement of it all and then you laugh, realising you
are already there, right in the thick of it.
Here is a question that I hold like a ticket to the
North in my hand: how can the act of telling and listening to a story liberate
us from our disconnected, data-driven perception of the world and shift our
attention towards what Iain McGilchrist calls the vast universe of the ‘right
hemisphere’? How can myths give us a language, a technology, to navigate a time
when dragons and ugly sisters rule, in a culture now broken open by
consequence?
When you pay attention to the archaic stories that Martin relates, you realise
they are not there to reflect the power and glory of an empire, to provide
escape or entertainment at the end of a hard-working day. They exist as a
reminder of our place and meaning on the Earth; a reminder of what we have to
undergo to become truly human, with a culture where art is the same as
knowledge.
Where in order to find the answer to that question you must sit, like a hare in
a field, listening to the landscape all around you, and wait for the object to
reveal itself.
CDC: Martin, at Base Camp you said: ‘The radical
power of story is to open us up to our uncolonised imagination.’ How is the
telling of a myth part of that?
MS: The thing that distinguishes oral storytelling
from, say, modern novels or theatre, is that the listener has to do an awful
lot of work. Good storytelling is a skeletal activity and what is happening in
a room is a hundred people are leaning forward, because their imagination is
having to work very hard to conjure flesh out of the wider story. Even
listening to stories is not a passive experience. You are meeting the energy of
the teller and the images within the story, so the energy is triangulate.
CDC: Do you think mythology plays a particular role
now in a world which is becoming increasingly fragmented and meaningless?
MS: Yes, myth has something direct to say. Many of
the stories we need now arrived perfectly on time about 5,000 years ago. Old
mythologies contain not only stories about our place on the Earth, but have the
Earth speaking through them, what the Islamic scholar Henry Corbin termed the mundus
imaginalis – where the human imagination is open to what David Abram
describes as the more-than-human world. So with myth, you are working not
just with imagination but with the imaginal, what many aboriginal cultures
would call the Dreamtime. In other words, as we turn ideas around in our head,
we’re not just thinking but we are getting thought.
What does it mean to get thought?
For the last 20 years I’ve been taking people out into very wild parts of
Britain, and for four days and nights they are absolutely alone, and often
towards the end of that time, the participant will touch the edge of that
experience. It’s very hard to talk about the imaginal in conventional language.
The most fitting language to address it is poetry or imagery or mythology. If
the language is too psychological it reduces the mystery. It makes the
mysteries containable and safe.
I’m tired of tame language addressing wild things.
We seem to be frantically creating handrails in and out of desperately
mysterious situations. And so to come back to the question: myth is a robust
and ancient way of addressing a multiplicity of consciousnesses that abide in
and around the Earth.
What is so powerful about an uncolonised imagination, a mythic intelligence, is
that it connotes but does not denote. It doesn’t tell you what it is. Its
images have a radiance that reveals different things to whoever is beholding
them. In storytelling, I know that when I say even something as definite as a
crow that is in the room, we are all seeing 30 different crows. It is important
that I don’t hit a PowerPoint presentation, and say this is the crow we’re
talking about. Everyone’s imagination is being stirred, where they are
remembering and catching a glimpse of crows in their lives before that.
CDC: So storytelling and myth also have a
relationship with time?
MS: Yes, and memory. Stories with weight to them
have what C.G. Jung terms ‘the lament of the dead’, which in our frenetic
culture we can no longer have time to hear. Most indigenous cultures will tell
you that this world belongs to the dead, that’s where we’re headed. So
mythology for me involves a conversation with the dead, with what you might
call ancestors.
Whatever we are facing now we need to have a root system embedded in weather
patterns, the presences of animals, our dreams, and the ones who came before
us. Myth is insistent that when there is a crisis, genius lives on the margins
not the centre. If we are constantly using the language of politics to combat
the language of politics at some point the soul grows weary and turns its head
away because we are not allowing it into the conversation, and by denying soul
we are ignoring what the Mexicans call the river beneath the river. We’re not
listening to the thoughts of the world. We’re only listening to our own
neurosis and our own anxiety.
CDC: Much of your work calls for a return to bush
soul and for us to remember. Do you feel these myths are resurfacing so we can
relearn our ancestor training that has been shut down for a very long time?
MS: I would say: if you don’t have ancestors you
have ghosts. At the moment many of us are so impoverished and lacking in a
cultural root system that what is around us are not ancestors supporting us but
ghosts depleting us. So one of the things we could do is to reach out to
stories, to practices – such as working on the land or a good art form – that
require skills, diligence, a willingness to be bored and to lose our addiction
to constant excitement. Myth and story put you into the presence of the old
ones who have told the story before you.
When I’ve been with the Lakota Sioux or other Native American groups,
I’ve seen that rather than telling stories from beginning to end like a Western
narrative with a wedding at some point, they can enter the story wherever they
want, like walking into a stream, and at that moment an image or scene in the
story gets told and that is the story. It’s just that glimpse that gets into
the lion’s blood of your imagination.
So I would say don’t worry about the whole of the story. Look for the moment
that speaks directly to you. Because like an acupuncture point, that is
your entry point into the great stream of the story. You don’t need to dam the
thing off at the beginning and the end. It’s more promiscuous than that, there
are buddings everywhere.
CDC: When you told the story of the ‘The Crow King
and the Red Bead Woman’ at Base Camp there were certain points where people
were feeling very moved and in tears. What is that upwelling of sudden feeling
in us all when we hear the story being told like that?
MS: One answer would be that this is a moment where
we collectively experience what William Blake used to call ‘a pinprick of the
eternal’ or the anthropologist Victor Turner ‘communitas’, where often
through grief there is a kind of permission given in the room to feel something
deeply in public. These days that’s quite rare. We tend to grieve and emote
away from other people. But that’s not the way traditionally it’s done.
Folk tales told well have the power to be tacit ritual. In other words they
have the strength to put their arms around the whole room and create a
container that for an hour you can cook in the images of the story. You can
allow yourself, bidden or unbidden, to be provoked by the images. And somehow
it is safe to go deep within it.
It’s really also to do with the skill of the teller. You might be an
accomplished storyteller technically but if you haven’t lived through some of
the travails of the story, there will be a gap between the telling of the tale
and what actually transpires. When those feelings happen in the room you know
the storyteller is synched up to this story: she’s not saying it’s her
story, but she has moved through the dark wood. She knows what it is like to
carry precious red beads in her mouth. She knows what it’s like to be ignored
and left for dead. She knows what it’s like to discern the difference between a
seduction and a courtship.
When you see somebody effectively trying to tell the truth, it seems to have a
deep, profound effect. So I think it’s partially to do with the way a room is
held, the feeling that you’re in the presence of something ancient, which these
stories are, and a readiness in the listener to allow themselves to just be
carried by the power of the thing.
CDC: Are these complex Siberian myths ones that
you’re focusing on at the moment, or do you have many myths that you’re working
with at a time?
MS: I work with a wide variety of myths. Over the
years, I have told a lot of stories that have come out of the Gaelic or
Arthurian world, or European fairy tales, Russian fairy tales and Siberian folk
tales. When you go into Siberia, you’re not really in the same terrain as the
Russian fairy tales any more. There’s a different quality to them. You are
dealing with stories that carry a lot less of a European influence in them and
more of the kind of nutritional complexity that you find in Native American or
Inuit stories.
One of the ways you notice it is that their stories
end in unexpected places. They do not follow the kind of climactic
Western narrative that we’re used to now.
I read a lot of stories for example from India or from Africa or from South
America, but I don’t feel equipped to tell them. When I’m working with people
who are training as storytellers, one of the things I say is find out what kind
of weather patterns live within you, find out what kind of animal you are, find
out what your ecosystems are. Because some stories you will find yourself
naturally attracted to, and others you can simply respect and admire.
For example, in a lot of Scandinavian or Icelandic stories, a formal,
incantatory, memorised way of telling the story really suits it and is
encouraged. But because I’m so improvisational as a teller, because I have such
a long-standing interest in wild things, one of the wildest things I think you
can do is to go on without a script. So that is why lots of unexpected things
tend to erupt when I’m telling. There’ll always be a beginning and a middle and
an end. But how we get there each time can be slightly different.
The sense of the story is what you as a teller bring that day. You’re watching
how the audience is responding, you’re seeing their eye contact, the moments
where they are leaning forward, when they’re pulling back. And that to some
extent tunes the telling of the story. Also you have the story tapping
you on the shoulder all the way through, and saying ‘Ah, ah, ah… I really want
you to slow down now, and describe in detail the yurt of the old woman.’ And so
I follow the direction of the story itself, but also what’s happening in the
room.
CDC: You wrote once, in your book Scatterlings
I think, that we were not sure what story we were in as a culture. If there
were a story that could speak of our present situation, that held in its
talons, if you like, or in its heart, a feeling for regeneration or return, for
making sense, for bringing together, for waking us up, what might that be?
MS: I do have a story. It’s called the ‘The
Lindwurm’. It’s a story that suggests that you and I have an exiled, slightly
older sister or brother, who was hurled out the window the night they were
born, and has sat brooding in a forest for many, many years, and has now
returned.
And somehow contained in the psychic nerve endings of this story, I feel is a
lot of information about what we’re living through both ecologically and
politically right now.
CDC: It has an active female protagonist who
transforms everything, is that correct?
MS: Oh yes. Without the ingenuity of a young woman
working in tandem with an old woman (who’s really a spirit of an oak tree) we
are going to be incinerated by the furious returning sibling, who devours everything
that comes into its grip. It takes the ingenuity of the young woman, with the
advice of the older woman, to not just defeat the serpent, but to free the
serpent. That’s what’s so beautiful about it. The days of conventional hero
myths are not serving us. What is being called for now culturally is a word you
find often in Ancient Greece: metis. Metis is a kind of divine cunning
in service to wisdom.
We can’t be naïve in times like this, because we are in the presence of
underworld forces that will do one of two things: they will either educate us,
or annihilate us. And in fairy tales whenever the movement is down – and the
movement culturally is down right now – you have to get underworld smart, have
underworld intelligence, underworld metis. I have a strong feeling that
a lot of what wants to emerge through many ancient stories is a kind of wily,
tough, ingenious and romantic force that needs to come forward at this point in
time.
CDC: Mythology often has what I call the Princess
Problem. You know where there is a passive, beautiful young female being, and
then the man, the hero, appears and does the noble thing. So I’m always alert
to stories where there can be a female protagonist to balance out all the hero
action and worship that got us into this fine pickle in the first place.
MS: I couldn’t agree more. Sometimes when I’m
telling ancient stories though I become aware that people in the audience are
almost auditioning the stories for some contemporary concern. And while I’m
sympathetic to the concerns of the time, the story itself is a living,
powerful, breathing ancient being. It radiates its strange, troublesome
intelligence out into the hearts and minds of everyone there and does its work.
But there are stories that are explicitly
about the resurgence of a feminine that is not defined by what the troubadours
call ‘the far-distant lady’. So you’re not the lady in the tower, where some
young man is singing madrigals to you day and night; you are up-close, wild,
occasionally brilliant, filled with opinions, big gnashing teeth, appetite,
desire, with hooves that have trodden the ground of the underworld.
My book Snowy Tower looks at the Grail story of the
knight Parzival, which superficially could be seen to be about a young
man becoming an older man. But underpinning that story is his relationship with
powerful, potent, active females, the most extraordinary of which is a being
called Kundrie. Kundrie has tusks. She has breasts that lactate deadly
nightshade; she has eyebrows so long she has to plait and tuck them behind her
ears; she has the snout of a boar and the ears of a lion. But she speaks three
languages, and (I rather love this detail) she has a hat from Paris. And most
importantly she is the one who, often in a fairly harsh manner, pushes Parzival
in the directions he needs to go to be in the presence of the Grail again.
So those stories are there. When I see people chopping up, cutting and pasting
ancient stories to make a new story with a very active female character that
has been taken out of three other stories, what we get is a mythic
image, but we don’t get a myth.
Now mythic is something that can be created in the imagination of a Jeannette
Winterson or a Tolkien. But myth itself is connected to time and space. It has
to pass through many mouths and many communities, until it takes on the kind of
weight that means it’s authentically a myth.
So my challenge for anybody is to regard themselves as a kind of a mythological
scholar in training. And to go out and to look through the old anthologies, get
a library card, and try and collect these stories that are waiting to say
something vital about the nature of our times.
And the second part of that challenge, the most crucial part of the research,
will be your individual expression of that story. It doesn’t have to be an oral
storytelling. It could be something you write down, or paint. You could craft a
boat from an image within the story. But one way or another you need to let the
story have its way with you.
CC:
Ah yes, so that it becomes creative and externalised rather than inward and
psychological. Talking of Parzival, there’s a line in Scatterlings where
you ask, in respect to medieval culture: 'What replaces the chivalric viewpoint
and creates anchoring for humans?’ There are not many myths that consider a
band of people working together, except perhaps Robin Hood and his Merry Men,
and Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. In terms of the future, it’s
clear we can’t be held in an individualist story, but one that brings community
into it, or a bigger relationship. And I wondered if you had any thoughts about
that?
MS: It’s as if they are folk memories of times when
we were living in much more closely knit relationships, both with each other
and the Earth; where at some point the leader, the king or the queen, has to
marry the wild for the health of the land. But you’re right, not only should we
accept that we need other people around us collectively, working and banging
into each other with our ideas, our feelings and our passions; but also that
myth says that within you is a multiplicity of intelligences, who all want
different things from you.
In many tribal stories and indigenous tales, there
is an implicit understanding that what we call psyche or soul
does not live in a person, but that we live within the psyche or the
soul. And the tribe, collectively, respond to and develop their lives through
that awareness, which is usually a very ordinary experience. It’s not a
question of belief, it’s a question of experience. However, in the West, we
have had such a different fate over the last few hundred years that there is now
a collective amnesia to the idea that we have a soul at all – whether there’s a
soul inside us, or that we dwell within one.
So when someone talks about the individual journey of someone in the West,
they’re having to make that journey because they do not have around them the
cultural certainties that a tribal group would have, to affirm that yes, we are
living within this wider thing, the mundus imaginalis, the soul of the
world, and your dreams and your opinions are connected to waterfalls and
jaguars and lightning storms.
It is a lonelier place for us to be because what is
surrounding us does not confirm an Earth-centred consciousness. So that’s why I
think the individual has been such a pronounced thing in myth and story over
the last few hundred years. But if we cannot get back to a more collectively
understood relationship with psyche, with Earth, with matter, with trees and
rocks and wolves and bears, with our neighbours, then we will be caught in an
enormous malfunction.
CDC: This brings me to a question I’ve wanted to
ask about the wild setting for such psyche and soul, as you have described it.
When so many of us are living in cities and urban areas, in depleted and
industrialised landscapes, how can we recover our relationship with wild things
and reconnect with that world?
MS: It’s a question I’ve been asked a lot from
people who are reading my books and are living in Detroit or Birmingham or
Prestatyn. Initially my response is ‘don’t be size-ist’. Twenty years ago I was
living in southeast London, and it was a great consolation for me that William
Blake had found a lot of what he needed, as a human and a thinker, in London.
He could kneel down and see a little grey thistle and he knew it was a smiling
little man waving at him.
It was a way of not just seeing but beholding
things. And when I lived in cities I would pay particular attention to what we
rather naïvely call weeds. Or I would go out to a small park next to the video
shop in Brockley, where there was a rather dejected-looking rowan tree. And I
would spend an enormous amount of time just attending to this rowan. There’s a
lovely line by the French philosopher Gaston Bachelard, where he says something
like ‘the Earth seeks to be admired by you’.
So if you do nothing else, admire the thing. Learn to give it praise. Learn to
speak its 12 secret names. You hear about the Inuit having all these different
names for snow. Well, I thought, what are the 12 secret names of those
old-growth oaks that I see down near Greenwich docks? My advice really is what
the Hindus call the ‘joyful participation in the sorrows of the world’. You
have to get amongst the cities. You have to glean what you can, praise what you
can, raise up what you can. I used to bemoan the fact that I didn’t have 400
acres of prime old-growth forest on my back door, until I realised that this
was just a surly child in me – one of these mythic characters I was talking
about.
So, I told myself: ‘you’re going to go out and become a praise-maker. You’re
going to go out and praise and be generous to things.’
You asked a question about chivalry or gallantry earlier on, and when I was a
little kid, one of my favourite books was called The Book of Chivalry,
and I got my mum to make me a little cape. And I would wander around, constantly
throwing this cape over puddles – it’s very embarrassing...
CDC: Oh, that’s sweet!
MS: But I now realise I was right. I wasn’t
throwing capes over puddles to maintain a patriarchal system of
domination over women, I just wanted to behave in a beautiful and good manner
to the Earth and its inhabitants. In the face of 1980s Thatcher’s Britain that
was my response – to get my little cape out. And I realise now in my mid-40s
that absolutely nothing has changed in me.
CDC: Your cape is still on the back of the door,
Martin?
MS: Yes, it absolutely is. Anybody with a cape gets
into the School of Myth!
So, what I’m saying really is: soul doesn’t end
with a tree or a stream. If you’re interested in animism, everything is alive.
So how is a city alive? There’s a wonderful storyteller and mythologist called
Michael Meade, who grew up in New York. And he has a great description of being
a kid on the subway. And every time he went up the stairs of the underground,
he was in a different district of New York with a radically different
ethnicity. So he goes up one set of stairs and it’s Little Italy; he goes up
another it’s China; he goes up another it’s Poland. And he said: I realised
that the city itself was teeming with its mythologies, that over a couple of decades,
those two cultures of the Poles and the Irish would inexorably start to weave
parts of their lives together, and this third thing would happen.
My attention has been on the diminishing tracts of wilderness in Great Britain.
But it can’t stop there for many of us, because that’s simply not the
environment we are living in.
CDC: I wanted to ask you finally about breaking
enchantment, about breaking the spell, which is a predicament in so many fairy
stories. Many of the illusions that we’ve been brought up with are now being
cracked open. Do you feel that the myths contain insights that we might reach
out for, not as a handrail but as a tiller, so we might steer our way through
these choppy waters ahead?
MS: First of all, I would say again that the word enchantment,
which ironically is often used about hearing a myth or a story, is the opposite
of what’s actually taking place. A story like ‘The Red Bead Woman’ and its
effect on a room is not an enchantment, it’s a waking up…
CDC: A disenchantment…
MS: Yes, if you’ve done your job well as a
storyteller, your story itself has a magical sensibility to ward off
enchantment and to raise up. Secondly, people often prefer to dismiss myths,
saying: it’s not true. But a way to think about myth is as something that never
was and always is. Or as a beautiful lie that tells a much deeper truth. But
one way or another when we lose our mythic sensibility, the powers in this
world that may not wish us well have a greater purchase on us, a greater hold.
I notice that several times a day I go into what
you could call a mild trance state. I’m not talking about ouija boards here!
I’m just talking about falling under the influence of advertising, or various
politically engineered neuroses that might be floating around. But I recognise
I have come into a kind of enchantment. And the way I recognise it is that I
feel less than grounded. I feel I’m not in the realm of imagination, I’m in the
realm of fantasy. So the imaginal is not present; the Earth as a lived,
breathing, thinking being is not present. What’s happening is I’m simply
fretting – to use my mother’s language – I’m spinning my wheels. And so
actually I think stories have a capacity to wake us up.
We are living in a time when we need symbolic
intelligence, not just sign language. We are being fed signs, and signs that
frighten us, and then paralyse us, and then colonise us. And imagination,
through myth, wants to give you symbols to raise you up.
A story is not just an allegory, or a metaphorical
point. It’s a love affair, and one of the most wonderful ways of breaking the
trance states being put on us at this point in time, is to figure out what you
love. Figure out what you’re going to defend. And develop the metis, develop
the artfulness, to bring it out into the world.
Images: A
different drum: Martin Shaw telling the Yakut tale of 'The Crow King
and the Red Bead Woman'at Base Camp, Embercombe, Devon [Photo: Warren
Draper]; cover of 'Snowy Tower'.
Martin Shaw is a
writer, mythologist and teacher. He has recently co-designed (with
anthropologist Carla Stang) the upcoming MA in myth and ecology at Schumacher
college, as well as being the creator of the oral tradition course at Stanford
University and the author of A Branch from the Lightning Tree,
Snowy Tower and Scatterlings: Getting Claimed in the Age of Amnesia. schoolofmyth.com